Just the Facts · Article

What an accessibility statement is actually for

It fails on every site we've ever scanned, it's the lowest-weighted item on the report, and it's the cheapest useful thing you can do all week. It is also not a legal shield, and anyone telling you otherwise is selling something.

Let's start with what it isn't. An accessibility statement does not make you compliant, does not stop a lawsuit being filed, and is not a defence. If a page says otherwise, it's marketing.

What it does do

It gives a real person who hit a real barrier a way to tell you, and a reasonable expectation that somebody will answer. That is the entire function, and it is worth more than it sounds — because a person who can report a problem and get a response is a person who often doesn't need to escalate.

It also demonstrates, in writing and with a date, that accessibility is something you are actively working on rather than something you have never considered. In a field where nearly half of last year's federal defendants were companies that had already been sued once, being visibly mid-effort is not nothing.

What a useful one contains

What standard you're working towards — for most sites, WCAG 2.1 or 2.2 at Level AA.
Honest current status. "Partially conformant" is a real, respectable answer, and far better than an unverifiable claim of full conformance.
Known problems you haven't fixed yet, named plainly. This is the part everyone omits and the part that makes the document credible.
A contact route that works — an email address or form that a human monitors, with a rough response time you can actually meet.
The date it was last reviewed.

What makes one worthless

Claiming full compliance. Nobody can verify that, automated testing catches only about a third of barriers, and an overstated claim is a written statement that can be used against you.
A contact address nobody reads. This is worse than having no statement, because it invites a report and then ignores it.
Attributing your accessibility to an overlay widget. Businesses running overlays have been sued, and plaintiffs' firms specifically target sites using them.
Writing it once and never revisiting it. A statement dated four years ago describes a website that no longer exists.

This is the smallest effort-to-benefit ratio on your whole report. An afternoon, no budget, no developer. It carries a weight of 1 out of 5 in the score, which is why people skip it — but the score isn't the point. Somebody being able to reach you is.

Pair this with the accessibility findings themselves, which is where the actual exposure lives. A statement without remediation behind it is a promise you haven't kept.

Educational information, not legal advice. An accessibility statement is not a legal defence and does not establish compliance with the ADA or WCAG.

Sources

Questions? Contact us